Unterschiede
Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen gezeigt.
| Nächste Überarbeitung | Vorherige Überarbeitung | ||
|
projekte:2021:mx-1 [2021/11/23 12:52] max angelegt |
projekte:2021:mx-1 [2022/11/11 11:26] (aktuell) max |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| ====== MX-1 Antenna (2m Band) ====== | ====== MX-1 Antenna (2m Band) ====== | ||
| Zeile 7: | Zeile 7: | ||
| Projectstatus: | Projectstatus: | ||
| - | [[regeln: | + | [[regeln: |
| + | |||
| + | ===== Remark ===== | ||
| + | This antenna has several disadvantages. First, having a large surface seems to be suboptimal for antenna. Hence using pipes would have been better. Secondly the mechanical solution at the tip is nice but does not involve a balun, which is preferable for dipole antennas. Overall i suggest to rework the general idea of this antenna for the next time. Still i'm using it sometimes as station antenna at home when doing VHF at high-power mode. My Yaesu FT-something handheld is only making 5 watts. The biggest disadvantage is that it does not have plug for coaxial cables but is directly attached to the wire. I could find any nice solution to this. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Project Goals ===== | ||
| + | ===== Material ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ^ **Desc** ^ **Qty** ^ | ||
| + | | PCV pipe | 1 | | ||
| + | | 3d printed cap | 2 | | ||
| + | | Coaxial Wire | > 2m | | ||
| + | | Distance Holders M3x5mm | 2 | | ||
| + | | Poles M3 | ~2m | | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Assembly ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Files ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The files are available on thingiverse: | ||
| + | ===== Photos ===== | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | {{: | ||